Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2023cv11062
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahmed v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2023cv05756
Petitioner:
Amar Ahmed
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 5:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Raymond Kornegay
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Magliocco v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 7:2023cv04907
Petitioner:
Anthony Magliocco
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe and Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility at Attica, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2023cv04756
Petitioner:
Raymond Kornegay
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant-Byas v. Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv03628
Petitioner:
Karmik Grant-Byas
Respondent:
JOHN/JANE DOE
Defendant:
Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azeez v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2022cv06028
Petitioner:
Abdool Azeez
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gakuba v. John/Jane Doe
as 22-385
Petitioner / Appellant:
Peter Gakuba
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Gakuba v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2022cv01039
Petitioner:
Peter Gakuba
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
