Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Smith v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
S. Shane Smith
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Todd Ishee, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 5:2022ct03415
Plaintiff:
S. Shane Smith
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Todd Ishee, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adeyola v. Reddy et al
as 5:2022ct03008
Plaintiff:
Umar Adeyola
Defendant:
Dr. Edavally Reddy, Jennifer Adkins, RN Ms. Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2021ct03288
Plaintiff:
David Alan Ritter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bryan K. Wheeler, Officer Kinner and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obataiye-Allah v. Jackson et al
as 5:2021ct03025
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, V. Outlaw, John/Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Uhuru Obataiye-Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Doe et al
as 1:2020cv00366
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John/Jane Does, FNU Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Harry James Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. SCHATZMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, SABEL CALDWELL, WENDY HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2018ct03359
Defendant:
Angela P. Dunbar, Tiffany Williams, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Charles Alexander, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mays v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03186
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, S. Ma'at, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ragland v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018ct03002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Terrance Ragland
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Sgt. Scott, Lt. McDougal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
