Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cunningham v. Headstart Warranty Group, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Headstart Warranty Group, LLC, Vehicle Service Department, Sing for Service, LLC doing business as MEPCO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cunningham v. Affordable Auto Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Affordable Auto Protection, LLC, Autoguard Advantage Corporation, Dimension Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Bernard et al
as 7:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jerry O Melvin
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt , Michael A. Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Bernard et al
as 7:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Graham
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt , Michael A Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Bernard et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. See 7:16-cv-257-BO.
as 4:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Graham
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt, Michael A Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin v. Bernard et al. Don't docket anything in this case. New Case # 7:16-cv-275-D.
as 4:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jerry O Melvin
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt, Michael A. Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL
as 1:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
