Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bizzell et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05745
Plaintiff:
Kamiyah Bizzell, Gibran Johnson and Calvin Peterson
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Michael Dalia, William Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fletcher v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv10755
Plaintiff:
Liam Fletcher
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Bekim Kalicovic, Sean Kwalwasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galarza v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv10898
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Carlos Aviles, Carlos Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Wilson Galarza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef
Marzuq v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04302
Plaintiff:
Farid Marzuq
Defendant:
The City of New York, Emerito DeJesus, Sean Drain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ameruso v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03381
Plaintiff:
Marc Ameruso
Defendant:
City of New York, Marvin Johnson and John/Jane Does, Nos. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garnett v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02930
Plaintiff:
Najee Garnett
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Cintron, Karlina Cortes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv02001
Plaintiff:
Ji Young Lee
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Walter Harkins, Joseph Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutter v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06317
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sutter
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Ilbey Aykac, Michael Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
