Cases 11 - 20 of 6,214
Doe #064 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #064
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #065 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
John Doe #065
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marriweather v. McLane Company, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02289
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
John Marriweather
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Logan
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Doss v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Harold Doss
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Doe #039
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Negrete-Neal v. Luraschi et al
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
Rheta Negrete-Neal
Defendant:
Anthony Luraschi, Apperson Crump, PLC, Timothy Ginski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
