Cases 1 - 10 of 553
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
MOSES-FARRARE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
EARLENE MOSES-FARRARE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER BERTHESI, BADGE#2090, POLICE OFFICER MARY F. KUCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Denman v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Denman
Defendant:
John Wetzel, George Little, Laurel Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
