Cases filed in Texas
Hill v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00557
Petitioner: John David Hill
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sulak v. Calpine Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv03545
Plaintiff: Phillip Sulak
Defendant: Calpine Corp., Frank Cassidy, John B Hill, III and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Scarantino v. Calpine Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03256
Plaintiff: Louis Scarantino
Defendant: Calpine Corporation, Frank Cassidy, John B. Hill, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01761
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Hill et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02572
Plaintiff: John W Hill and Frances E Hill
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Woodbury Financial Services Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01906
Plaintiff: John E. Hill
Defendant: Woodbury Financial Services Inc and Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hill v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01506
Plaintiff: John Scott Hill
Defendant: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. and Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 3:2010cv00151
Plaintiff: John Scott Hill
Defendant: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2008cv00215
Plaintiff: Stephen Allen Henderson
Defendant: State of Texas, Drue Farmer, John E Hill, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?