Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lang et al v. Washington County, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Lang, Timothy Keith Williams, John Michael Taylor and others
Defendant:
Washington County, Alabama, Brad Johnston, William Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cochran
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
John E. Taylor
Defendant:
Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
John E. Taylor
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Reese
as 2:2011cv02733
Plaintiff:
John Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00720
Plaintiff:
John M Taylor
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Franklin et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
John William Taylor
Defendant:
William Emmett Franklin, Sgt. Fox and Sue Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
