Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baker v. American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Adam Baker, Adam Baker, Elsa Embaye and others
Defendant:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. doing business as Premiere Global Services, Inc., American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd., Premiere Global Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Muhammad et al v. City of College Park, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv02395
Defendant:
John Adams, Officer Gregory Verlander, Kirt Ziesman and others
Plaintiff:
Safiyyah Muhammad, Stanley Muhammad, Raeesah Muhammad and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TAYLOR v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 3:2017cv00090
Petitioner:
JOHN ADAM TAYLOR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. State of Georgia
as 1:2017cv01899
Petitioner:
John Adam Taylor
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 7:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAM ROGERS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MATTHEW BANNISTER, RANDY LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAM CHAVEZ
Defendant:
WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Presnell v. Douglas County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2013cv01771
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Presnell
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office, Phil Miller, Marco Antonio Miranda-Perez and others
Continental Appliances, Inc. v. Doe
as 1:2012cv01634
Plaintiff:
Continental Appliances, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Movant:
Sure Heat Manufacturing, Inc. , Michael Scott Mulberry and John Adams
Continental Appliances, Inc. v. Doe
as 1:2012mi00050
Plaintiff:
Continental Appliances, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Movant:
Sure Heat Manufacturing, Inc. , Michael Scott Mulberry and John Adams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
