Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2019cv00813
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Doe, Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Gov. Phil Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. Roland Abangan, et al
as 18-60183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. ROLAND ABANGAN, Official and Individual Capacity, DR. JOHN DOE, Official and Individual Capacity, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Hale v. Hopson et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
N.P. Hopson, John or Jane Doe for Boswell, Nurse Nichels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Bridget Smith, Roland Abangan, Stacey Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 15-60243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MIKE HATTEN, Health Service Administrator of Wexford for Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution
Hale v. Abangan et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Roland Abangan, John Doe, Unknown Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Lege et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Unknown Lege, Pat Olsen, Unknown Colter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. Harrison County Bd of Suprs, et al
as 11-60129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and ANTHONY BROWN, Sergeant
Hale v. Harrison County Board of Supervisors et al
as 1:2008cv01385
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Harrison County Board of Supervisors, Melvin T. Brisolara, Donald A. Cabana and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
