Cases 1 - 10 of 21
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLOYD, LIEUTENANT STAFFORD, JAMES BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Abramowski et al v. Nuvei Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Pawneet Abramowski, Amanda Abrams, AG Mortgage Value Partners Master Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Nuvei Corporation and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc.
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BUTLER v. PIERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
SERGEANT PIERSON, SERGEANT HEIDER, SERGEANT WADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-1371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
BUTLER v. SWINTEE CORP. et al
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
SWINTEE CORP. and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilhelm v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
