Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
AKG v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
AKG, Austin Gunter, Aaron Vanbuskirk and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, John Canavan, Tracy McDaniel and others
Pilson v. Grand Casino et al
as 5:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Donald Pilson
Defendant:
Richard Smotherman, Grand Casino, John Canavan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilson v. Grand Casino et al
as 6:2019cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donald Pilson
Defendant:
Richard Smotherman, Grand Casino, John Canavan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canavan v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02141
Plaintiff:
John Canavan
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
