Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harris v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Deborah E. Curcillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pete McManus v. Gainesville Housing Authority, et al
as 17-14185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE MCMANUS
Defendant - Appellee:
GAINSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, SHIRLEY JONES, JOHN CHERRY, Dir. and others
MCMANUS v. GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
PETE MCMANUS
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, SHIRLEY JONES, JOHN CHERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weinacker v. Baer et al
as 1:2015cv00267
Defendant:
Charles Baer, Travis M. Bedsole, Jr., Henry A Callaway and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Y. Weinacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pete McManus v. Gainesville Housing Authority, et al
as 13-13396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE MCMANUS
Defendant - Appellee:
GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, SHIRLEY JONES, JOHN CHERRY and others
MCMANUS v. GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
PETE MCMANUS
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY , SHIRLEY JONES, JOHN CHERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCMANUS v. GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
PETE MCMANUS
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, SHIRLEY JONES, JOHN CHERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-30403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-30131
Plaintiff-Counter Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Cross Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
