Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Teague et al
as 3:2012cv01223
Plaintiff:
Teejay Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Teague, Edward Reynolds, Francisco Ortiz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. DeStefano et al
as 3:2012cv00995
Plaintiff:
Lashunda Adkins and Ronda Adkins
Defendant:
John DeStefano , Jason Jemiola , Christopher Cacela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. New Haven et al
as 3:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Erin Mitchell , Danielle Digirolamo , Josh Smith and others
Defendant:
City of New Haven , John DeStefano , Dean Esserman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salaman v. DeJesus et al
as 3:2011cv01993
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Salaman
Defendant:
Edwin DeJesus, J. Peterson, Frank Limon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cutler v. New Haven et al
as 3:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Cutler
Defendant:
City of New Haven and John DeStefano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Abrams et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Terrance Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaddy v. DeStefano et al
as 3:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Albert Eaddy
Defendant:
John DeStefano, Jr., Frank Limon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
