Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Johnson v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson and Travon Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Leyden, Officer Officer Navarro, Snohomish county sherrif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v King County Adult Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Dwante Jackson and Dawnte Jackson
Defendant:
King County Adult Corrections, D Echols, Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cater v King County et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County, King County Adult Corrections Department, Faauma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinlan v. Diaz
as 2:2022cv00605
Petitioner:
Terrance Joe Quinlan
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broadus v. Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention et al
as 2:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tate Broadus
Defendant:
Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, John Diaz and Head of Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Diaz
as 2:2021cv01279
Petitioner:
Remington Donovan Willingham and Remington Dono LeBoe
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boyd v. Constantine et al
as 2:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Julie Shaup, Dow Constantine and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH AUGUSTINE BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Krier v Diaz
as 2:2021cv00102
Petitioner:
Steven J Krier
Respondent:
John Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. King County et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Reyes, Christenson, King County Adult Corrections Department and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery et al v. King County et al
as 2:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Hikari Tamura, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Montgomery, Tom Montgomery, A.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
