Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Waters v. Facebook Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv30168
Defendant:
William Higgins, Katherine Peter, Google LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Rian Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Fredrickson et al
as 1:2020cv11894
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, USC(University of Southern California), Michael Waterstone and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Dennis Solomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2020cv11825
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Michael Gomes, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gillespie v. Staub et al
as 3:2020cv30121
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Peggy Roggenbuck Gillespie, David Angier and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clopper v. Harvard University et al
as 1:2020cv11363
Defendant:
President and Fellows of Harvard College, The Harvard Crimson, JOHN DOES(1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Clopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osman v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2020cv11356
Plaintiff:
Elmutaz Osman
Defendant:
City of Boston, William O'Hara, William Dwan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillespie v. Staub et al
as 3:2020cv30050
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Peggy Roggenbuck Gillespie, David Angier and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Konze v. City of Salem, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv12191
Defendant:
City of Peabody, Police Officer John Doe 3, Police officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
David Konze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
