Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Bazzoon v. Maye et al
as 5:2016cv03151
Plaintiff:
James D. Bazzoon
Defendant:
Claude Maye, (fnu) Baker, (fnu) Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cary v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 15-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD A. CARY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, CDOC, REA TIMME, Warden, CTCF and others
Gardiner (ID 46842) v. McBride et al
as 5:2015cv03151
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Gardiner
Defendant:
Bill McBride, Gene Ward, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Jeffery (ID 100308) v. Martin et al
as 5:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery
Defendant:
Tammy Martin, Jarred Watson, Rudy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Weeks, et al
as 14-6190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES THOMAS WEEKS, II, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Stevens v. John Doe United States Attorney et al
as 5:2014cv03131
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadbury (ID 93743) v. Bush et al
as 5:2014cv03027
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Gadbury
Defendant:
Dean Bush, Chris Weis, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Counce v. Wolting et al
as 5:2013cv03199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Counce
Defendant:
Ryan Wolting, Kansas State Highway Patrol, Tracy L. Ploutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
