Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chastis Nixon v. John Doe
as 16-6366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHASTIS RAY GOMEZ NIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Superintendant of Salisbury Correctional Institution, JOHN DOE, JR., Superintendant of Alexander Correctional Institution, GASTON COUNTY and others
JEAN-EWOLL v. REYES
as 3:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
JEAN-DENIS JEAN-EWOLL
Defendant:
P REYES, B TURNER, V MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv03658
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Brian Owens, John Doe, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kevin Smith v. Jon Ozmint
as 10-6526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 09-7957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HAROLD WATTS, B. A. BLEDSOE and others
Norman Rattliff, Jr. v. Gerald McPeak
as 09-7645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN RATTLIFF, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent, New River Valley Jail, N. H. PELKINS, Correctional Officer Supervisor, New River Valley Jail and JOHN DOE, JR., Primary Care Physician, New River Valley Regional Jail
Gregory Richardson v. Michelle Mitchell
as 08-8372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY A. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Sheriff, LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, LIEUTENANT HURST and others
Defendant - None:
CITY OF RICHMOND
Kevin Smith v. Lester Hinson, Jr.
as 07-6558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Butler v. Shearin
as 06-7905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEARIN, Warden, A W BOGDAN, BRADFORD and others
Defendant:
H. SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, NURSE WILLIAMS, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
