Cases 11 - 20 of 23
King v. Doe (1-5)
as 6:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lee King
Defendant:
John Doe (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Segovia-Lopez v. Mr Sonnier et al
as 1:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Javier Segovia-Lopez
Defendant:
Mr Sonnier, Mrs Sonnier, Mr McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pickett v. Henry #07894 et al
as 9:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jody Wayne Pickett
Defendant:
Henry #07894 , County of Polk, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Steven J Spencer
Defendant:
Attorney General and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White et al v. Southwestern Correctional LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Kristi L White and Alice Diane Miller
Defendant:
Southwestern Correctional LLC , LaSalle Management Company LLC , Johnson County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Conlan v. Michael King, et al
as 15-50786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KING, Detective #4127, Austin Police Department, JOHN DOES 1-5, Police Officers, Austin Police Department, BRANDON SHEFFY, Austin Police # 4622 and others
Sumrall v. Corso et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Sumrall
Defendant:
Frederick Corso, Joseph Tuten, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Conlan v. Michael King, et al
as 13-50221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KING, Detective #4127, Austin Police Department and JOHN DOES 1-5, Police Officers, Austin Police Department
Conlan v. King et al
as 3:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlan v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Michael King, Brett Magill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
