Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McConico et al v. Village of Carol Stream et al
as 1:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
Kyenna McConico and Barnes Kennetha
Defendant:
Village of Carol Stream and Village of Carol Stream Police Officers John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhone et al v. Polfliet et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Antwan Rhone and Keith Grigsby
Defendant:
P.O. Daniel Polfliet, P.O. John Doe 1-6, Village of Willowbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slabon v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05914
Plaintiff:
Andrew Slabon
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6, Booker, Swanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2018cv04148
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael L Tyus, Administrative Review Board and others
Plaintiff:
Montez R Williams Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Keithus Wiley
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6 and Eddie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. U.S. Marshal's Service Agency et al
as 3:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Holloway, III
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service Agency and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. U.S. Marshal's Service Agency et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Holloway, III
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service Agency and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Olson et al
as 1:2015cv11548
Plaintiff:
Steven J Podkulski
Defendant:
Thereasa Olson, Director Mueller, Director Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv03130
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Mr. Binns and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-6
as 1:2012cv08903
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
