Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Crockett v. Furness et al
as 6:2023cv03904
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Crockett
Defendant:
P.A. Furness, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wise v. Nelson et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cederick Jerome Wise
Defendant:
Kenneth Nelson, Arthur Frederick, Divine Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Childers v. Hicks et al
as 2:2021cv00238
Defendant:
Troy Anderson, A Cannon, John Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Trinity Childers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Washington v. United States et al
as 5:2016cv03913
Plaintiff:
Burl Washington
Defendant:
United States, Mrs. Cruz, Loranth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel-Ibarra v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ruben Rangel-Ibarra
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. County of Charleston et al
as 2:2011cv03431
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Frazier
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frazier v. County of Charleston et al
as 4:2011cv03431
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Frazier
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hearn et al v. Lancaster County et al
as 9:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Cody A Hearn and Christopher A Hearn
Defendant:
Lancaster County , Barry S Faile , Debbie Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2010cv02821
Plaintiff:
Carl Blake Brock
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolt v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2010cv01374
Plaintiff:
C Allen Bolt
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
