Cases 41 - 50 of 160
Mabry v. Newton et al
as 3:2019cv02194
Defendant:
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deshan Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dawes v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2019cv02122
Defendant:
Captain Garza, Shellano, Malrick and others
Plaintiff:
William Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harley v. Quindiahjen et al
as 3:2019cv01607
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Quindiahjen and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Harley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joe Alfred Taylor v. Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department et al
as 2:2019cv04398
Plaintiff:
Joe Alfred Taylor, III
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Juan Martinez, Preston Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019at00154
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, FBI Christopher Wray, United States and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
John Doe 1 et al v. A.J. Boggs and Company
as 1:2019cv00061
Defendant:
A.J. Boggs and Company
Plaintiff:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy L. Whiting v. Department of the California Highway Patrol et al
as 5:2018cv02652
Defendant:
Mike C. Alvarez, John Doe 1, Warren A. Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Whiting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
