Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Hampton v. Willow Grove Park Mall et al
as 2:2020cv04298
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hampton
Defendant:
Willow Grove Park Mall, John Doe 1-2, VCC Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSE v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2020cv02683
Defendant:
SRGT MCGONIGLE, JOHN DOE #5, GABRIEL PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. CO1. JOHN DOE 1 (ILLER) et al
as 2:2019cv05329
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
CO3. JOHN DOE 3 (BROWN), CO2. PAMELA SELLERS, CO5. GINA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04754
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CAPTAIN JOHN DOE 11 and others
Plaintiff:
TYRICO BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITFIELD et al v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2019cv04217
Defendant:
P/O JOHN DOE 6, P/O JOHN DOE 2, P/O JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WHITFIELD and ASHLEY MCCLINTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01443
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE CURRIAN and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE LEE SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. GARDNER et al
as 2:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
EDWARD E. STEWART, III
Defendant:
JAMI GARDNER , SANDI DUNLAP , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
