Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Beckham et al v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2014cv00696
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Ohio, Daniel A Dunlap , Cynthia Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Cachet Beckham and Marcus A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruckman v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
David W Ruckman
Defendant:
Thomas C. Jenkins, Walker, (Jr) Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kister v. Appalachian Behavorial Health Care et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chad Kister
Defendant:
Appalachian Behavorial Health Care , Jane Krason , Mary Beth Holler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brant v. Bhandari et al
as 1:2012cv01426
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Brant
Defendant:
Madhukar Bhandari , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. McConnegly et al
as 1:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Dan J. Day
Defendant:
C.O. McConnegly, John Doe #1, C.O. Nauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maloon et al
as 2:2009cv00954
Plaintiff:
Brock Smith, Brock Smith, Christral Smith and others
Defendant:
Jerry L Maloon, II, David R Hunt, Lisa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Demetreus Logan
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, City of Euclid, City of Strongsville and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
David M. Clapper and David M. Clapper
Defendant:
Clark Development, Inc., Mikar, Ltd., Unizan Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kijowski v. City of Niles et al
as 4:2008cv02762
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kijowski
Defendant:
City of Niles, CIty of Niles Police Dept, Craig Aurilio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
