Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs et al v. Doe 2
as 3:2023cv02271
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs and John Doe 1
Defendant:
John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe 1 et al v. Scripps Health
as 3:2023cv02215
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Scripps Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Girrot et al
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Girrot, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Agular et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas
Defendant:
Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00296
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Sepulveda v. Galindo et al
as 3:2020cv02079
Defendant:
E. Galindo, John Doe #2 and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Martin Sepulveda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bencomo v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv01550
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, John Doe 3, Daniel Paramo and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Bencomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Soto v. Los Angeles County et al
as 3:2020cv01406
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Los Angeles County, City of Norwalk and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Campos Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00709
Plaintiff:
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc, John Doe #1, Ventex Co., Ltd. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Troutman Sanders
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
