Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Calvin v. John Doe One et al
as 2:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Donald Calvin
Defendant:
John Doe One and John Doe Two
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson et al v. F/V The Porn Star et al
as 2:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Lee Ferguson, Perry Sandberg and Mobile Fleet Service Welding and Repair LLC
Defendant:
F/V The Porn Star, Dann Ray Ireland, Louisa Case and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Crow et al v. Trans-System, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05665
Plaintiff:
Steven Crow and Cheryl Crow
Defendant:
Cosmo Specialty Fibers, Inc., Trans-System, Inc., AirGas Specialty Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coon, et al v Cosmo Specialty Fibers Inc, et al
as 3:2015cv05667
Plaintiff:
Marvin Coon and Terri Coon
Defendant:
Cosmo Specialty Fibers, Inc., Trans-System, Inc., AirGas Specialty Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devine et al v. Hiscall, Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv05754
Defendant:
Hiscall, Inc. , John Doe One, Jane Doe One and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Devine and Leonard Steven Devine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniels et al v. The Boeing Company
as 3:2013cv05679
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , John and Jane Doe and John Doe Two Company
Plaintiff:
Clifford C Daniels and Eileen N Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Getty Images (US), Inc. v. Virtual Clinics et al
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Getty Images (US), Inc.
Defendant:
Virtual Clinics, Veterinary Website Designers, Ronald Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. Van Boening et al
as 2:2011cv01942
Plaintiff:
Sky-Steven Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Ron Van Boening, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Williams et al
as 2:2008cv01206
Plaintiff:
Kirk A. Thompson
Defendant:
Ronnie Williams, M. Clarke, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
