Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pitts v. Ige et al
as 1:2018cv00470
Defendant:
Shawn H. Tsuhu, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Larry Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURZANSKI v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv08866
Plaintiff:
SEAN TURZANSKI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, LAWRENCE ARTIS, NUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 7:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Lacy et al
as 4:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Waqas Wilson, Adil Mohammad, Biniam Tekle Abraha and others
Defendant:
Robert Lacy, Kenneth Landgrebe, John Doe 1 to 50 and others
Movant:
Fazal Karim, Francisco J Espinosa, Rufino Revercio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael J. Fegans v. Larry Norris, et al
as 06-3473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael J. Fegans
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities, John Lowe, Assistant Warden, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
