Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Williams v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2025cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff's Department and John Doe (3:25-cv-364)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. Doe
as 3:2025cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe (3:25cv16)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Doe 3:25-cv-19
as 3:2025cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe (3:25-cv-19)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fareed v. City of Carrollton et al
as 3:2024cv03251
Defendant:
City of Irving, John Doe 1, City of Carrollton and others
Plaintiff:
Baheejah Fareed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniell v Fuller et al
as 6:2024cv00091
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, Jane Doe #2, David Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Justin A Daniell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv02895
Defendant:
John Doe 5, John Doe 3, John Doe 7 and others
Plaintiff:
St Jude Pain Centers LLC, Kenneth L Reed, Reed Migraine Centers of Texas PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Pickett v. John Doe #1 et al
as 9:2024cv00214
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie M. Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickett v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #5, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie M. Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamez v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe #2, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Tamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
