Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bungie Inc v. Elite Boss Tech Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01112
Defendant:
Officer, LPD John Doe 1, Officer, LPD John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bungie, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Bungie Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simon v. Manhattan Mini Storage, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05890
Defendant:
McKinney's Shelter, John Doe, Warren Wilhelm, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Malvar Egerique v. Chowaiki et al
as 1:2019cv03110
Defendant:
Ms. Linda Benrimon, C.O. John Doe 5, David Benrimon Fine Art LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alejandro Domingo Malvar Egerique
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
The City of New York v. Wolfpack Tobacco et al
as 1:2013cv01889
Plaintiff:
The City of New York
Defendant:
Wolfpack Tobacco, Cloud and Company, Allegany Sales and Marketing and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The City of New York v. Gordon et al
as 1:2012cv04838
Plaintiff:
The City of New York
Defendant:
Robert Gordon , Marcia Gordon , John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Government Employees Insurance v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd.
as 12-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Infinity Health Products, Ltd., ILya Mugerman, MSSA Corp. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Oksana Kovalenko
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv05611
Defendant:
Aleksander Afanasyev, Amega Inc., Betty Andresol and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Indentity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Viss Supply, Inc:
John Doe 1
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of West Coast, Inc:
John Doe 10
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Chesteron, Inc:
John Doe 11
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Tita Co:
John Doe 12
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Bilt-Rite Orthopedics & Safety, Inc:
John Doe 13
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Wellcore Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 14
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Galasa, Inc:
John Doe 15
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Eco Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 2
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Mikos Trading, Inc:
John Doe 3
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of MDSS Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 4
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Excell Plus, Inc:
John Doe 5
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Riviera Wholesale, Inc:
John Doe 6
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Optom Inc:
John Doe 7
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Delazoom, Inc:
John Doe 8
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of New Step Services, Inc:
John Doe 9
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of John Doe Corporations 1-10:
John Does 16-25
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MILLS v. CAPITAL ONE BANK et al
as 2:2008cv03788
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MILLS
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, THOMAS M. BROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
