Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Kiderlen v. O'Brien et al
as 6:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
Steven Kiderlen
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, Uknown Castro, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. 6503 U.S. Highway 301, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
6503 U.S. Highway 301, LLC, Tariq Subhi Motei Abuzahra, 6503, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Liebman et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2013cv21118
Plaintiff:
Jay Liebman and Andrea Liebman
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Joseph Ackerman, Hugo Banziger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boddie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Willie Boddie
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv04096
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derrick Evans
Defendant:
Cathelene Tina Robinson , Erica Ashley Alexander , John Does 1-5 and others
Marino v. Nauyalis et al
as 1:2011cv22456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marino
Defendant:
Joseph Vincent Nauyalis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Hopkins
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Case name not on file
as 4:2011mc00013
Plaintiff:
LECERE CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, Ltda., v. Pinacle Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv20476
Plaintiff:
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, LTDA.
Defendant:
Pinacle Trading Corp., Marco Ramirez, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHISBY v. DOE 1, et al
as 5:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
KELLY WHISBY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
