Cases 81 - 90 of 201
Winward Bora LLC v. Prophete et al
as 2:2018cv01048
Defendant:
Nyc Parking Violations Bureau, Correction Officer John Doe #3, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Winward Bora LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Hoffer v. City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2018cv01197
Plaintiff:
Richard Hoffer
Defendant:
City of Yonkers, City of Yonkers Police Department, Police Officer Elyssa Tellone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Hembrook
as 6:2018cv06091
Plaintiff:
Michael Joshua Henderson
Defendant:
Brian Hembrook, Abboit, Reginald Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2017cv08075
Plaintiff:
Steven Crawford
Defendant:
Montgomery, S. Urbanski, R. Rappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Keenan et al
as 1:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos
Defendant:
J. Keenan, D. Bourgeois, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borders El Bey v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv06678
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
Byron Brown, Daniel Derenda, Robert Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Rensselaer County Jail et al
as 9:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Wright
Defendant:
Rensselaer County Jail, Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv02615
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Correction, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tyrone Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. John Doe # 1 et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
John Doe # 1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Ault et al
as 6:2016cv06816
Plaintiff:
John Hogan
Defendant:
Ault, Battisti, Masner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
