Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PURVIS v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2016cv01830
Plaintiff:
ERIC PURVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER S. COLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAR v. PHOENIXVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv01338
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEAR
Defendant:
PHOENIXVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, WILLIAM J. MOSSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANGFORD v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LANGFORD
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, PAUL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BAYLISS v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY , DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT SMYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark et al v. Conahan et al
as 3:2009cv02535
Plaintiff:
Raul Clark, Raul Clark, Raul Clark and others
Defendant:
Michael T. Conahan, Mark A Ciavarella, Luzerne County Juvenile Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Surber vs Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al.
as 4:2007cv02844
Plaintiff:
Desha Surber and Desha Surber
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Titan International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
