Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Jones v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv01436
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Jones
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, City of Cleveland Police Department, Michael R. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Flaherty et al.
as 2:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Symoen White
Defendant:
Craig S. Flaherty , City of Columbus , John Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fisk v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fisk
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roden v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01195
Plaintiff:
Aaron Roden
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinnell v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
Alexis Pinnell
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Dalton Harris
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloran v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
James C Holloran
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Lee Hatley , Josh Hedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. Thompson et al
as 3:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Cherosco L. Brewer
Defendant:
M. Thompson, John Doe, I and Shively Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01166
Plaintiff:
Cody Scott
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hallman v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01165
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hallman
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
