Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Walker v. Sharp County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Amber Walker
Defendant:
Sharp County, Arkansas, Stephen Davis, Mark A Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lyles v. Wren et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joan Lyles
Defendant:
Charles Lee Wren, Jr, William Cameron, Little Ditch Farms LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Flanary v. Elkin et al
as 2:2022cv02174
Defendant:
Jerry Dorney, Darrell Elkin, P.A., Ricky Denton and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flanary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walden v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Walden, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, David White, Will Brakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Tractor Supply Co.
as 5:2021cv05067
Plaintiff:
Donna McDaniel
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Co. and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooks-Clements v. Lane et al
as 2:2020cv02231
Defendant:
John Does I-IX, Louis Lane, HEC Leasing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Hooks-Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winfrey v. Monsanto Company et al
as 6:2020cv06046
Plaintiff:
Christy Winfrey
Defendant:
John Does I-V and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malmo v. Durcholz et al
as 5:2020cv05068
Defendant:
Thomas E. Durcholz, John Does I-V and Styline Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sarah Leighann Malmo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodman v. Monsanto Company et al
as 6:2020cv06009
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Mary Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. Monsanto Company et al
as 5:2019cv05233
Plaintiff:
William Robbins
Defendant:
John Does I-V and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
