Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pare v. Harmony House, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv30097
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Harmony House, Inc., Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pare v. Pare et al
as 3:2018cv30055
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais, Ernest Laflamme, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemens v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2013cv13084
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clemens
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe No.2, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Griffin et al
as 1:2013cv11080
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Greene
Defendant:
Thomas Griffin , Stephen Fabiano , John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinton v. Stryker Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv12003
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , JOHN DOE CORP 1, JOHN DOE CORP 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Judith D. Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bessette et al v. City of Springfield, Massachusetts et al
as 3:2010cv30190
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bessette
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Massachusetts, Jeffrey M. Asher, Theodore Truoiolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josey v. Doe Number 1 et al
as 1:2010cv11479
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Josey
Defendant:
John Doe Number 1, John Doe Number 2, John Doe Number 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
