Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Johnson v. City of New York
as 1:2021cv10535
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Jaylene Rodriguez, Sgt. Jose Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03236
Defendant:
Micheal D. Cardozo Esq., Cathy Chiou, Charmaine Cort and others
Plaintiff:
Dermont Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. The City of New York
as 13-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mario Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Jesus Rodriguez, Individually; Det.; Shield No.4220, in his official capacity and John Doe, P.O.'s # 1-10, individually, (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown) and in their official capacity (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Marshall v. The City of New York
as 12-2479
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Joshua Marshall
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O.'s #1-10 Individually and in Their Official Capacities, (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, Salim Randall, P.O. Shield No. 15331, Individually and in His Official Capacity and Michael Burbridge, P.O. Shield No. 15488, Individually and in His Official Capacity
Abreu v. Romero
as 10-4827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernesto Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Romero, Detective, Shield # 05726, Alfred Hernandez, Detective, Shield # 5046, John Doe, P.O. and others
Richard Rowell v. Ruben Martino
as 10-137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Rowell
Defendant - Appellee:
Ruben A. Martino, Civil/Housing Ct. Judge, John Doe, P.O. of the 25th PCT Acting on 10/20/05, M. Durand, NYCHA ec.8 Housing Assistant and others
Harris v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv11297
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Harris
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, John Doe P.O. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
