Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Swinson v. Harold et al
as 1:2012cv05577
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Defendant:
Robert W. Harold, Esq., John Doe (1-25) and John Doe (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
George Albert Fernandez
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Guy Pierce, Marvin Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prall v. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2012cv10104
Plaintiff:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Office of The Bar Counsel, City of Boston Law Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
ROBINSON v. SHEFFIELD et al
as 2:2011cv04191
Plaintiff:
OSCAR G. ROBINSON
Defendant:
TERRANCE SHEFFIELD, MILTON MENDOZA, SAMUEL THOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROCKETT v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2011cv02609
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CROCKETT
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESCOBAR v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02497
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL ESCOBAR
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MONTELEONE, GAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACOSTA v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02215
Plaintiff:
RUBEN ACOSTA
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MONTELEONE, GAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, Damien v. United States of America, et al
as 3:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
United States of America , Congress, United States Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
