Cases 21 - 30 of 254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
KOSTOVSKI v. BRYANT et al
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
SUZANA KOSTOVSKI
Defendant:
ELIJAH BRYANT, THOMAS BOYD, SEASIDE HEIGHTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SALERNO v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SALERNO
Defendant:
BRICK TOWNSHIP, KYLE DUDAK, JAMES RICCIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
EBRON v. MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO. INC. et al
as 1:2021cv19597
Plaintiff:
MAURICE EBRON
Defendant:
MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC., JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PARNELL v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2021cv19326
Plaintiff:
VINCENT A PARNELL
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW D. KUNZ, ERNEST THOMASON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ELITE RESTORATION, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv19097
Plaintiff:
THE ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
ELITE RESTORATION, INC., CHARLES CULBERTSON, III, STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv18450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCOTT v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv15790
Plaintiff:
KERIDA SCOTT
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUMPLER v. PANOS BRANDS, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv15732
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CRUMPLER
Defendant:
PANOS BRANDS, LLC, STACY PETRIELLO, ANGEL DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv15119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
