Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
CANFIELD v. MODANY et al
as 1:2015cv02011
Plaintiff:
DONNALD CANFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN, DANIEL FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nottenkamper v. Modany et al
as 1:2015cv03390
Plaintiff:
Janice Nottenkamper
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany , Daniel M. Fitzpatrick , John F. Cozzi and others
Movant:
Sasha Wilfred
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWRENCE v. MODANY et al
as 1:2014cv02106
Defendant:
JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN, DANIEL M. FITZPATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Nottenkamper v. Modany et al
as 1:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
Janice Nottenkamper
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany, Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, John F. Cozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilfred v. Modany et al
as 1:2013cv03110
Plaintiff:
Sasha Wilfred
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany, John F. Cozzi, Thomas I. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Thomas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012cv00068
Defendant:
Christopher Arnold, Shari R. Avenius, Helen E. Brand and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Thomas v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Christopher Arnold, Shari R. Avenius, Helen E. Brand and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gregory v. Modany et al
as 1:2010cv09084
Plaintiff:
Kent J. Gregory
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany, John F. Cozzi, John E. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORENSTEEN v. MODANY et al
as 1:2010cv01510
Defendant:
JEFFREY R. COOPER, JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER B. ORENSTEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
