Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2021cv07361
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, Lawrence E Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jesse Olivar v. John Potter
as 19-16204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE OLIVAR
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-17315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv00520
Defendant:
G. Auerbach, Brian Beckwith, Roy Blunt and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
City and County of San Francis, et al v. USPS, et al
as 12-15490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTE OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and MICHAEL DALEY
City and County of San Francis, et al v. USPS, et al
as 12-15473
Plaintiff:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTE OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and MICHAEL DALEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
