Cases 11 - 18 of 18
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy John Faulkner v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01913
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Faulkner v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01555
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Faulkner v. ADT Security Services, Inc., et al
as 13-17124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FAULKNER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, WEST, INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
John Faulkner v. ADT Security Services, Inc., et al
as 11-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FAULKNER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, WEST, INC. and TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC.
Faulkner v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00968
Plaintiff:
John Faulkner
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. , ADT Security Systems, West, Inc and Tyco International (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Clay v. Rochell, et al
as 1:2002cv00044
Plaintiff:
David Freeman Clay
Defendant:
Kevin Sherills, Jeffery Spice , Olmo Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
