Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEVINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19361
Plaintiff:
JOHN FITZGERALD BEVINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delay v. Forton's Express Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Delay
Defendant:
Forton's Express Inc, Danny Scott Jacobs and Old Republic Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Marbury Bey v. Scheurman
as 3:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Marbury Bey
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Scheurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv02025
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 21-14155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Davis v. Osceola Regional Medical Center
as 6:2021cv02008
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Osceola Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. Cruthirds et al
as 1:2021cv04760
Plaintiff:
Brittney Irving
Defendant:
John Fitzgerald Cruthirds, C.R. England, Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2021cv01872
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53892
Plaintiff:
JOHN FITZGERALD BAUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
