Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Scott Boger v. Gene Johnson
as 11-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT M. BOGER
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, JOHN JABE, JOHN GARMAN and others
Baines et al v. Barlow et al
as 7:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Artis Baines, Bryan K Jones and James I. Thomas
Defendant:
Rebecca W. Barlow, Harold Clarke, John Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottrell v. Jabe et al
as 7:2010cv00505
Defendant:
Investigator T. Adams, Lt. J. Artrip, Sgt. L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamal Muwwakkil v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL S MUWWAKKIL
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, LARRY HUFFMAN, JOHN GARMAN and others
Johnson v. Mueller et al
as 7:2010cv00431
Defendant:
Patricia Adams, Tony Adams, Bellamy and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Shear et al
as 7:2010cv00381
Defendant:
M. Boggs, S. Clark, D. Dallafior and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Gholson v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON, etc., all
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Head Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN JABE, Deputy Director for VDOC, RANDALL MATHENA, Former Arrest Warden at ROSP and others
Smith v. Davis et al
as 7:2010cv00263
Defendant:
W. Davis, John Garman, W. Ingle and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerall Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boger v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Boger
Defendant:
D.A. Braxton, Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00169
Defendant:
Robert Bivens, Sgt. Cochrane, Lt. B. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
