Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Myers et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc et al
as 1:2023cv10767
Plaintiff:
John Hill and J.H.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv10944
Plaintiff:
John Hill and John Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cruz Cruz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Christian Cruz Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Ron Claude and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gitter et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11899
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hidalgo, Joseph Guidone, Luz Dary Gomez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01436
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Leonard John Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dixon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
Tamel Dixon
Defendant:
City of New York , Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Colvin
as 7:2014cv02804
Plaintiff:
John Hill
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stanford v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01736
Plaintiff:
Aunray Stanford
Defendant:
City of New York , Dora B. Schriro, Michael Hourihane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Equity Risk Partners, Inc. v. Ambos et al
as 1:2012cv00670
Plaintiff:
Equity Risk Partners, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Ambos , John Hill , Maureen McGurk-Denley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. China-Biotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07838
Plaintiff:
John Hill
Defendant:
China-Biotics, Inc., Song Jinan, Li Chi Yuen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
