Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Randolph v. Fuertes-Rosario et al
as 9:2011cv03327
Plaintiff:
Antonio Martinelle Randolph
Defendant:
L Fuertes-Rosario, John J LaManna and G Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Randolph v. L. Rosario
as 10-7731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO MARTINELLE RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FUERTES ROSARIO, HSA-MLP, JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden and G. LINK, Physicians Assistant
Dennis Williams v. John LaManna
as 10-6070
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN J. LAMANNA, et al
Randolph v. Rosario et al
as 9:2009cv03166
Plaintiff:
Antonio Martinelle Randolph
Defendant:
L Fuertes Rosario, John J LaManna and G Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Michael Flanigan v. US
as 09-7950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, REX BLOCKER, Physician FCI Edgefield and others
Terrance Lowdermilk v. John LaManna
as 09-7737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE LOWDERMILK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden, FCI Edgefield, WANDA HARRISON, Case Manager Coordinator, FCI Edgefield, GARY KOGER, Case Manager, FCI Edgefield and others
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 8:2009cv02092
Plaintiff:
Byron Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John J LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
David Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 09-7205
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity
Gosier v. LaManna
as 3:2009cv00931
Petitioner:
Thomas Gosier
Respondent:
John J LaManna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnny Gay v. John LaManna
as 09-6635
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY WAYNE GAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden, FCI Edgefield
Respondent - None:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
