Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Voneida v. Johnson
as 1:2015cv01911
Petitioner:
Steven A. Voneida
Respondent:
John Johnson
Defendant:
PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAGICOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STEVENS et al
as 2:2015cv04644
Plaintiff:
SAGICOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROLLIE STEVENS and JOHN JOHNSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SWOPE v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv00939
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SWOPE
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , JOHN JOHNSON and LEONARD DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. LEXISNEXIS GROUP et al
as 2:2013cv01194
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOHNSON
Defendant:
LEXISNEXIS GROUP, LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS BUREAU, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv04025
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DICKERSON et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03338
Plaintiff:
ERIC DICKERSON , CHARLES BROWN , HOYLE GRANGER and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01875
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRODIE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRODIE , SUE BRODIE , ROBERT AVELLINI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ER SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06305
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOHNSON
Defendant:
ER SOLUTIONS, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04860
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
