Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Donahue v. City of Hazleton, PA et al
as 3:2014cv01351
Plaintiff:
Sean M Donahue
Defendant:
City of Hazleton, PA, Frank V DeAndrea, John Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILBUR v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv04457
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONARD WILBUR
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Boozer v. Foulds et al
as 3:2013cv01990
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Boozer, Sr.
Defendant:
Renee Foulds, Adams, John Ebersole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEONARD et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60177
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONARD and SANDRA LEONARD
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , FOSTER WHEELER LLC., GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEONARD v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv60033
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONARD
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION , FOSTER WHEELER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRUMP v. TOWNSHIP OF DARBY et al
as 2:2010cv05582
Plaintiff:
WARD ALVIN CRUMP
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF DARBY, THE DARBY TOWSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRIAN PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORBIN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2010cv00509
Petitioner:
JOHN LEONARD CORBIN
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WERRILL v. AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv63356
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONARD WERRILL
Defendant:
AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES, INC., GREAT INDEPENDENCE SHIP COMPANY, GREAT HAWAIIAN PROPERTIES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KING v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74944
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEONARD KING
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
