Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jacqueline Young, et al v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 17-55269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACQUELINE YOUNG, BRADFORD SOULE, JOHN MELVILLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
THE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, Proposed Intervenor
MELVILLE v. SPARK ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08706
Defendant:
SPARK ENERGY, INC. and SPARK ENERGY GAS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 14-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant:
Broome County Sheriff's Department, C. Peters, Investigator, individually, Freddy Askar, Investigator, Broome County Sheriff's Department, individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Charles Woody, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 13-4087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant:
Broome County Sheriff's Department, C. Peters, Investigator, individually, Freddy Askar, Investigator, Broome County Sheriff's Department, individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Police Department, J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 12-2701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant:
New York State Police Department, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellee:
J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Charles Woody, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Jim Hawley, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant:
New York State Police Department, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unkechauge Indian Nation v. Paterson
as 10-4981
Plaintiff:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Unkechauge Indian Nation
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
David Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, Jaime Woodward, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, William J. Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Tax Enforcement, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Unkechauge Indian Nation v. Paterson
as 10-4976
Plaintiff:
Unkechauge Indian Nation
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
David Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, Jaime Woodward, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, William J. Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Tax Enforcement, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Seneca Nation of Indians v. Paterson
as 10-4758
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Seneca Nation of Indians
Intervenor - Appellant:
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
David Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, Jamie Woodward, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, William Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Tax Enforcement, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York Association of Convenience Stores, City of New York and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Unkechauge Indian Nation v. Paterson
as 10-4598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Unkechange Indian Nation and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant - Appellant:
David Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, Jaime Woodward, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, William J. Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Tax Enforcement, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
