Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McNamara v. Siegfried et al
as 1:2023cv01820
Defendant:
Francine Mendez, Scott Siegfried, Chris Smith and others
Plaintiff:
John McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith and Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Elmore v. Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
as 1:2020cv01994
Defendant:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
John Elmore and John Michael Elmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Standard Hemp, LLC et al v. Silen et al
as 1:2019cv01162
Defendant:
Shawn Adamson, Mark Silen, Mark (I) Silen and others
Plaintiff:
Standard Hemp, LLC and John Michael Merritt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harty v. Noble
as 1:2018cv02659
Defendant:
Cynthia Noble
Plaintiff:
John Michael Harty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazo et al v. Merritt, Jr. et al
as 1:2018cv00831
Plaintiff:
Josse Anthony Mazo and Maritza Riascos
Defendant:
John Michael Merritt, Jr., Full Spectrum Nutrition, LLC and Full Spectrum Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ZUNIGA v. City of Commerce City, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv03117
Plaintiff:
Arjelia ZUNIGA
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, Colorado, John Michael REINHART, Troy SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuniga v. City of Commerce City et al
as 1:2017cv03118
Plaintiff:
Arjelia Zuniga
Defendant:
City of Commerce City , John Michael Reinhart , Troy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrick v. Sabas et al
as 1:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ellen Petrick
Defendant:
Saul Diaz Sabas , John Michael Collins and AZ Asphalt LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadus v. DeCesaro et al
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
John Michael Broadus
Defendant:
Anthony A. DeCesaro, Chapdelain, CHP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
