Cases 1 - 10 of 23
STEVENS-NUNEZ v. BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
KAREN MARIE STEVENS-NUNEZ
Defendant:
BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, JAMES DILLON, CHIEF JOSEPH MOORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
BASSETT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BASSETT, JOHN MILLER, ASHLEY MILLER and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
Petitioner:
KYLE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. UNUM
as 2:2019cv00732
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILLER
Defendant:
UNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROTH v. CITY OF HERMITAGE et al
as 2:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
LORI ROTH
Defendant:
CITY OF HERMITAGE , BRIAN E. BLAIR , ERIC JEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MILLER v. THE PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2015cv00132
Petitioner:
FRANK JOHN MILLER, JR.
Respondent:
THE PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
MILLER v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2012cv00742
Petitioner:
JOHN MILLER
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ozymko v. Miller et al
as 4:2010cv02074
Plaintiff:
Svitlana Ozymko
Defendant:
John Miller and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52321
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
